Mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention for elementary school teachers: a mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, more than half of the teachers working in primary education experience high levels of work stress. Compared to other professions, teachers are more likely to drop out from work and develop mental illnesses. Almost one in five even choose a new profession within 5 years after starting as a teacher. This indicates an urgent need for interventions to reduce stress levels in teachers. However, few evidence-based effective interventions targeting stress and work-related problems in the primary educational system are available. AIM: In the current paper, we describe the protocol for a randomized controlled study (RCT) comparing an 8-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) intervention with a wait list control condition in primary school teachers. We hypothesize that teachers who participate in the MBSR programme will report less stress (primary outcome) than those in the control group at post-test and at 3-month follow-up. We also expect a decrease in teachers' absenteeism and improvements of mental health, teacher skills, classroom climate quality and the pupil-teacher relationship (secondary outcomes). Finally, we hypothesize that self-compassion, mindfulness skills and emotion regulation skills could mediate effects. METHODS/DESIGN: A mixed-method study will be conducted among N=155 Dutch primary school teachers (grade 1 to 6). The quantitative study will be an RCT, in which teachers will be randomly allocated to the MBSR or waiting list control condition. Trial participants will not be made actively aware of their condition. The data analysts will be blinded. Online questionnaires will be sent to teachers before and after the MBSR programme, and at 3-month follow-up. Information about absenteeism will be collected. In the qualitative part of the study, we will interview teachers to examine their perceived effects of MBSR on their teaching skills, the classroom climate quality and the pupil-teacher relationship. DISCUSSION: This protocol paper describes a mixed-method study design with an RCT and a qualitative evaluation to evaluate an MBSR programme on perceived stress among primary school teachers. If the MBSR programme proves to be effective, it could be implemented as a programme to reduce stress and improve mental health and teaching outcomes in primary school teachers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederland Trial Register NL. Registered on 19 November 2019-retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8171.

[The therapeutic alliance as predictor in the treatment of young people]. / De therapeutische alliantie als voorspeller in de behandeling van jongeren.

BACKGROUND: The quality of the therapeutic alliance is an important factor in the treatment of both adult and adolescent patients in psychiatry. Little is known about the importance of the therapeutic alliance among youths who seek help for their substance abuse problems in addiction treatment. AIM: We investigated the importance of first treatment session therapeutic alliance for outcome in youth mental health and addiction treatment, considering both the youths' and therapists' perspective. METHOD: 127 adolescents participated in a prospective clinical cohort study, with favorable or unfavorable treatment outcome after 4 months as primary outcome measure. At the end of the first treatment session, youths and their therapists were asked to rate the therapeutic alliance. RESULTS: Youths' and therapists' perceptions about the therapeutic alliance at the start of treatment were predictive of treatment outcome at four months follow-up. In particular, the combined perspective on first-session alliance by both youths and therapists appeared a strong predictor for treatment outcome. If both youths and therapists rated the therapeutic alliance as weak, the percentage of youths showing a favorable treatment outcome was much lower (23%), than if youths and therapists rated the alliance as strong (70%). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the importance of a combined perspective on the therapeutic alliance for predicting treatment outcome among patients in youth mental health and addiction treatment.

[Recurrence and chronicity of major depressive disorder in the general population: results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2]. / Terugval en chroniciteit van depressieve stoornis in de algemene bevolking; resultaten van NEMESIS-2.

BACKGROUND: The naturalistic course of major depressive disorder (mdd) and risk indicators for recurrence and chronicity of mdd are best investigated using a psychiatric epidemiological population study without clear selection bias. However, such studies are scarce, thereby limiting clinical decision-making concerning the monitoring and maintenance of treatment.
AIM: To present findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (nemesis-2) regarding the recurrence and chronicity of mdd and associated risk indicators in the general population.
METHOD: At baseline, two groups were selected to examine the recurrence and chronicity of mdd at follow-up. Diagnoses were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (cidi) 3.0.
RESULTS: Among respondents with remitted mdd (n = 746), the cumulative recurrence rate was 4.3% at 5 years, 13.4% at 10 years, and 27.1% at 20 years. Time to recurrence was predicted by vulnerability characteristics (childhood abuse, negative life events, parental psychopathology), physical health, functioning, clinical characteristics of depression (previous episodes, severity, medication use), psychiatric comorbidity and mental health use. Among respondents with current mdd (n = 242), 12% developed a chronic depressive episode over 6 years. The chronic course was predicted by risk indicators similar to those for recurrence, except for vulnerability characteristics and physical health.
CONCLUSION: These risk indicators may help identify depressive patients requiring monitoring and who might benefit from preventive interventions or maintenance treatment.

[New numbers on the duration of major and minor depressive episodes in the general population; results from NEMESIS-2]. / Nieuwe cijfers over de duur van depressieve episoden in de algemene bevolking; resultaten van nemesis-2.

BACKGROUND: Relatively little research has been conducted that can reliably be used by psychiatrists, psychologists and general practitioners to estimate the recovery time of their patients suffering from depression. The treatment guideline for depression submits that half of those with mdd will recover within three months.
AIM: To present the findings from nemesis-2 (the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2) on both the duration of depressive episodes in the general population and associated risk indicators.
METHOD: The respondents that had developed a depressive episode between the first two follow-up assessments were selected; 286 with a clinical depression according to dsm-iv criteria (mdd) and 107 with a subclinical depression (MinDD). The episode duration was assessed with the Life Chart Interview.
RESULTS: Half of the patients with mdd recovered within 6 months and 12% had not recovered after 3 years. The mean duration for mdd was 10.7 months. Better physical and mental health before depression onset predicted shorter duration. Longer duration was associated with comorbid dysthymia or anxiety disorder. In comparison, the median duration of MinDD was half the length of mdd (3 months), whereas the mean duration (8.7 months), the percentage that had not recovered after 3 years (10%) and risk indicators for episode duration hardly differed.
CONCLUSION: In the guideline for depression it is assumed that half of those with mdd will recover within three months. Our study, however, found the median duration of mdd to be twice as long. Consequently, only a short period without active treatment can be justified. This paper also concludes that MinDD cannot be regarded as a transient, self-limiting mood state.

Recurrence and chronicity of major depressive disorder and their risk indicators in a population cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The naturalistic course of major depressive disorder (MDD) and risk indicators for recurrence and chronicity are best studied using a population sample without clear selection bias. However, such studies are scarce. This limits clinical decision-making concerning monitoring and maintenance treatment. METHOD: Data were used from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2, a psychiatric epidemiological cohort study among a representative adult population. Two groups at baseline were selected to study recurrence and chronicity of MDD at follow-up. Diagnoses were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. RESULTS: Among remitted MDD cases (n = 746), the cumulative recurrence rate was 4.3% at 5 years, 13.4% at 10 years and 27.1% at 20 years. Time to recurrence was predicted by vulnerability characteristics (childhood abuse, negative life events, parental psychopathology), physical health, functioning, clinical characteristics of depression (previous episodes, severity, medication use), psychiatric comorbidity and mental health use. Among current MDD cases (n = 242), 12% developed a chronic depressive episode over 6 years. Chronic course was predicted by similar risk indicators as recurrence, except for vulnerability characteristics and physical health. CONCLUSION: These risk indicators may help to identify patients requiring monitoring and who could benefit from preventive interventions or maintenance treatment.

Duration of major and minor depressive episodes and associated risk indicators in a psychiatric epidemiological cohort study of the general population.

OBJECTIVE: Hardly any studies exist on the duration of major depressive disorder (MDD) and factors that explain variations in episode duration that lack biases. This limits clinical decision-making and leaves patients wondering when they will recover. METHOD: Data were used from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2, a psychiatric epidemiological cohort study among a nationally representative adult population. Respondents with a newly originated depressive episode were selected: 286 MDD and 107 minor depressive disorder (MinDD) cases. DSM-IV diagnoses were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0 and episode duration with the Life Chart Interview. RESULTS: Among MDD cases, median episode duration was 6 months, mean duration was 10.7 months, and 12% had not recovered at 36 months. Longer duration was associated with comorbid dysthymia, anxiety disorder, psychotropic medication use (i.e. antidepressants or benzodiazepines prescribed by a mental health professional), mental health care use and suicidal behaviour. Better physical and mental functioning before depression onset predicted shorter duration. Among MinDD cases, shorter median duration (3 months) but similar mean duration (8.7 months), risk of chronicity (10% not recovered at 36 months) and risk indicators for episode duration were found. CONCLUSION: As the risk of chronicity was similar for MDD and MinDD, MinDD cannot be dismissed as a merely brief mood state.